Netflix is building channels that don't require you to choose what to watch.
You turn it on, something plays, then something else plays. You sit there the way you sat in front of cable television for thirty years. The ad-supported tier ($8.
Their entire economic model depends on this fact. Netflix is charging money for what killed cable television's ability to hold an audience once choice became possible. MTV Networks launched Flux in 2007, a subscription service that offered $9.
The concept was straightforward — viewers would browse passively instead of deciding, and discovery would happen by accident. For two years, this seemed viable. By 2009, Flux was gone. The moment people paid for access to video content, they stopped accepting being told what to watch.
Passive consumption only works when it's free and supported by advertising. The instant payment enters the equation, payment means choice. It means control. It means you're not going to sit through ten minutes of filler because someone else programmed the channel. The structural problem is not a business disagreement. It's a phase transition, like the one that turns water into vapor at exactly 100 degrees.
Below the payment threshold, passivity feels inevitable, even restful. The television did the thinking. Above it, passivity feels like waste. You paid money for this? You're watching something you didn't select?
Pluto TV survives because it asks nothing of you except attention to ads. You get what you get. The social contract is transparent. Netflix's $8. 99 tier breaks that contract.