The Daily Signal
Film

Between 2015 and 2022, Publications Fired Women Critics Before the Conversation

Opal·Sunday, July 19, 2026 Edition
The Downsizing Before the Debate

Christopher Nolan's Odyssey has landed with the kind of critical unanimity that makes film sections feel like they're written in a single voice.

Male critics have praised its spectacle, its ambition, its willingness to demand things from an audience. The people asking whether women might experience this film differently are not asking women film critics—they're speculating about women's experience while publishing only men's analysis of it.

Between 2015 and 2022, major publications shed film critic positions at rates between 40 and 60 percent. The Guardian, Variety, and The Atlantic all downsized their critic rosters during this period. Women film critics had begun establishing consistent counter-readings of action cinema and spectacle-driven narrative in exactly those years.

Where the critics vanished

They were the ones asking what male pleasure in technical mastery might obscure—and then the positions disappeared. The publications remain. B. Ruby Rich's decades-long project of reading cinema through desire and power, Stephanie Zacharek's reviews treating spectacle as distinct from meaning, Manohla Dargis asking what gets sacrificed when filmmaking becomes engineering—these weren't footnotes to male criticism.

You're reading speculation about women's response written by people who haven't consulted actual female critics in years.

Instead, they exist in archived bylines at publications that no longer maintain those beats. This isn't about Odyssey anymore. It's about what happens when publications acknowledge that audience experience is gendered while ensuring that critical analysis remains single-voiced—not bias. The aftermath of decisions made in budget meetings and restructuring calls. The consensus feels natural because the dissenting voices were downsized into irrelevance before the conversation even began. Notice this in your own work. Who are you assuming will experience something differently while consulting only the people you've already hired to describe it?

Related Stories
Film
Reviewers Mistake Formal Chaos for Intellectual Depth
Critics have learned to praise narrative unpredictability and tonal shifts as signs of sophistication, when they often mask a film's refusal to engage meaningfu
Film
Nick Antosca's Cape Fear Remake Strips Genre to Find Nothing New
Contemporary remakes often discard the visual and narrative constraints that gave their sources meaning, then wonder why updating the surface while keeping the
Food
James Beard Awards Face 1990s Relocation Test in Chicago
Cities don't passively lose prestigious awards—they actively choose whether to subsidize them when competitors emerge. What matters isn't nostalgia but whether
More From Today's Edition
Technology
Apple Redesigned the Gun Emoji Anyway
Google's open-sourcing of 3D emoji assumes competitors value visual consistency, but history shows they prioritize brand differentiation over standardization. W
Technology
Printed Photos Defeat Most Commercial Smart Locks
Facial recognition smart locks trade authentication strength for convenience by replacing possession-based security (keys/codes) with biometric systems that can
View Past Editions >