Ubik's actual terror lives in the decay mechanics, not the premise.
The building doesn't explode, the technology doesn't vanish — it degrades, a spray can that works intermittently, a door that sometimes locks, a phone that connects to people who may already be dead but sound like they're breathing.
This is the architecture of Dick's prediction: the world that stays broken just long enough for you to stop believing in it. Consider the spray can itself—Ubik is the novel's central object, and it works only sometimes, in only some places, for only some people — not a binary switch, not a dramatic failure, but a probability that declines.
When Glen Runciter's enforcers use it against Psi abilities, they don't get certainty — they get advantage. The product is obsolete before it ever quite fails, and everyone knows it. This teaches the nervous system something that catastrophic failure never could: that you can't trust what kept you alive yesterday. Dick embeds this in dialogue where people don't panic about the spray wearing out — they discuss it matter-of-factly, like weather, saying 'The Ubik is getting weaker' rather than 'the Ubik failed.' The weakening is the lived experience, and it's contagious because the entropy of one device infects the user's faith in all devices.
A lighter that won't spark, a car that starts half the time, a loved one whose voice comes through the phone but whose presence feels like it's been eroding for months — this is what we actually fear now, not AI gods or blackout switches but the slow tax on convenience, the creeping sense that your tools are leaving you before they formally break, for Ubik predicted not the end of infrastructure but the end of trusting it.
Read the scene where Runciter tries to use Ubik in the deteriorating world (Part Four, the escalating failures) and compare it directly to your experience with any software you've used for three years—the specific moment you stopped believing the update would help.
Seek out 'Philip K. Dick and the Phenomenology of Technology' by Eric C. Russert—a paper that traces how Dick's treatment of objects deteriorating in real-time (not sci-fi time) rewrote what entropy could mean in narrative, which almost no Dick criticism actually addresses.