The Daily Signal
Technology

Orcas Ramming Sunfish Reveals How We Mistranslate Animal Intelligence

Rosa·Thursday, July 23, 2026 Edition
When Our Categories Mislead Us

A team of marine biologists off the coast of Western Australia documented orcas coordinating an attack on sunfish, ramming the same target in sequence until it became manageable prey.

The footage generated coverage that treats animal intelligence as perpetually surprising. As though we should be scandalized every time a non-human brain solves a problem. The researchers offered two competing explanations. The younger orcas were learning a feeding technique from the adults, or everyone was just having fun.

This framing contains an assumption so deep it goes undefended. The researchers treat "learning" and "play" as separable categories. As though an orca brain sorts behavior into the same filing system ours does, one or the other, not both, not something else entirely.

How we translate what we see

But marine mammal researchers actually disagree about whether cetaceans experience that distinction at all, or whether we impose it retroactively onto behavior that doesn't naturally cleave that way. When you watch an orca practice a hunting technique by ramming a sunfish, you are seeing an animal practice. When you watch it ram another sunfish, you see practice again — and at what point does it become play? What internal threshold gets crossed?

They name two categories and assign the behavior to one. The disagreement in the field is whether the behavior is even categorizable in human terms. When we encounter an intelligence structured differently from our own — we do not observe it neutrally. We translate it, force it into our taxonomies. The sunfish ramming could be teaching, could be play, could be something orcas do that has no corresponding word in English because no orca ever evolved a brain that needed to separate those experiences into different boxes.

You do this constantly in your own work. You watch a collaborator's process and call it either "iterative refinement" or "procrastination," as though the person themselves had drawn that line. You haven't. You just needed to name what you were seeing so you could write about it, manage it, file it away. The orca doesn't care which category you choose.

Related Stories
HumanPotential
Vaccine-Hesitant Parents Understood the Science, Questioned the Power
Science skepticism isn't usually about misunderstanding mechanisms—it's about concluding institutions serve different incentives than they claim. When people re
Comics
PS1 Games Never Left, Only Their Legitimacy Did
The article argues that PS1 games like Gran Turismo aren't actually unplayable—they run perfectly on emulators and exist in ROM archives—but are legally unavail
Anime
Parasyte's Four-Year Cycle Burns Goodwill Faster Than Death Note's Decade
Netflix is producing a third major live-action Parasyte adaptation arriving in 2027, compressing the same multi-version saturation pattern that killed Death Not
More From Today's Edition
Culture
Sophia Maddox's Manson Discovery Profitable Only Because Grandfather Murdered
Genealogy documentaries like Hulu's Manson project achieve viewership not through the quality of personal testimony but by monetizing inherited notoriety—the pl
Film
Musk's 'Accurate' Homer Depends on Erasing the Interpreter
Elon Musk's promise that Grok Imagine will produce a "historically accurate" Odyssey adaptation assumes fidelity to ancient poetry is both possible and desirabl
Film
Strange New Worlds Swings Between Whimsy and Catastrophe Without Explaining Why
Star Trek: Strange New Worlds' tonal instability in Season 4 mirrors a deliberate choice made by The Next Generation's 1994 finale, which used shifting tone to
View Past Editions >