The American founding's most enduring contradiction is not that some men owned slaves while writing about equality. It's that we have never stopped producing intellectual arguments against equality, and we have never stopped funding them at precisely the moment when those arguments became useful to wealth.
Consider what happened after Andrew Carnegie sold Carnegie Steel to J. P. Morgan for $480 million in 1901. He spent the next decade funding libraries, yes, but also writing essays and hiring ideologues to explain why the inequality he had benefited from was actually natural, inevitable. Good for society.
Carnegie discovered that Herbert Spencer's ideas about survival of the fittest could retroactively justify what he had already done through monopoly consolidation and union-busting. The philosophy arrived after the crime, not before it.
This pattern repeats, and the beneficiary question exposes it immediately. Who wanted a theory of natural inequality? Not the philosophers first — the men with the money. They hired the philosophers to build the intellectual architecture that would let them sleep at night and keep the next generation from redistributing what they'd taken. This is not ideology floating free from incentive. It is incentive purchasing ideology at the moment it becomes strategically useful.
What's happening now with effective altruism and transhumanist philosophy is the reverse move, and it's more dangerous because it's proactive. Peter Thiel and other tech billionaires are not discovering these philosophies after consolidating power. They are funding them before consolidating power, preemptively licensing their own future inequality. They are paying philosophers to explain why inequality will be necessary for innovation, why AI requires concentrated control, why exit velocity matters more than democracy. The reason to watch this pattern is not to predict whether it will work. To understand that whenever someone discovers a grand philosophical reason why power should concentrate, you should ask first who is paying the bill. The answer reveals what they already plan to do.