The Daily Signal
Film

Why festival programmers choose films nobody explains

Barnaby·Friday, September 18, 2026 Edition
The credential versus the discovery

Two films played TIFF, and the fact that you should see them tells you almost nothing about what they do. Furies and Re/Pair arrive with the same credential and zero explanation of why they matter right now, in this moment, rather than some other moment when different films were playing. This is how festival coverage works: naming becomes blessing, and the blessing replaces the argument.

“

Two films played TIFF, and the fact that you should see them tells you almost nothing about what they do.

”

The real problem isn't the films. The problem is that a neutral recommendation is a non-recommendation masquerading as one. It trusts the programmer's taste more than the viewer's eyes, which is backwards.

Furies, a directorial debut by Zetna Fuentes, is a formal investigation into what happens when women stop performing the emotional labor men expect of them—not as a political statement but as a structural choice, where the camera itself becomes complicit in the demand for female readability. Re/Pair, from Thea Sharrock, examines how two people reconstruct intimacy after it has been deliberately destroyed. Means the film must rebuild grammar itself, making the viewer participate in every fractured moment. Neither film is content to be watched. Both demand something from the audience before they offer anything back.

What the program notes won't say

That distinction matters. TIFF audiences don't need another credential. They need to know which films are solved problems and which are problems you're about to step into. Furies makes you complicit in the gaze. Re/Pair makes you complicit in the repair. These are not the same gamble, and neither is a neutral pleasure.

When a critic explains what a director was attempting before explaining whether it worked, readers can make an actual choice instead of trusting a brand. They can ask themselves whether they want to be complicit in that particular way, whether they have the patience for that particular structure, whether this problem is one they're interested in solving alongside the filmmaker. That's the only currency that matters at a festival: not whether you saw the film. Whether you saw it with your eyes open.

Related Stories
Film
Marcus Theatres' 2024 Surrender Became Everyone Else's New Floor
Marcus Theatres accepted A24's shortened theatrical windows in 2024—the same terms it rejected in 2021 before breaking ranks—but this time without negotiating l…
Insight
That One Story Overruled All The Evidence
A single vivid anecdote can override everything you know statistically — and understanding why this happens is the first step toward thinking more clearly about…
Science
Psychedelic Trials Skip the Solution They Already Know
Psychedelic researchers face a methodological crisis: their drugs are so perceptually obvious that placebo controls fail, yet they ignore the proven 1990s solut…
More From Today's Edition
Technology
Can you trust a platform to preserve games it owns?
Xbox's disc-to-digital conversion feature, announced as preservation strategy, mirrors Microsoft's 2008 Games for Windows Live licensing model—which promised pe…
View Past Editions >