The Daily Signal
Film

Venice loves Penélope Cruz and Javier Bardem. The Oscars might not.

Vera·Thursday, September 10, 2026 Edition
When prestige becomes currency

Penélope Cruz and Javier Bardem walked the Venice red carpet for 'Bunker' to the kind of ovation that makes the room feel smaller. That collective intake of breath when two of Europe's finest actors appear on screen together. The film is a marital drama set largely in a single room, Paolo Sorrentino directing two accomplished people at the precise moment their marriage folds. Industry skeptics are already writing the Oscar resistance into the story: a foreign auteur, a genre the Academy has exhausted, two actors who need the validation far less than the film needs their names. The skeptics are hedging against an Academy that no longer exists.

Five years ago, that calculation made sense. Then Sorrentino premiered 'The Hand of God' at Venice in 2021 to rapturous acclaim. A deeply personal Neapolitan film about a young man's relationship with his mother and the supernatural, with an almost entirely unknown cast. The industry consensus was certain: this was a festival darling, the kind of film that wins its prizes and stops. Two cast members, Filippo Scotti and Toni Servillo, received Oscar nominations anyway.

That wasn't an outlier. It was a signal the Academy had been drifting for a decade toward rewarding Venice prestige in acting categories over the old preference for broad commercial validation. The shift happened quietly enough that prediction models built on 2015 data still run today. What changed was the voter: the Academy expanded. The people voting on acting categories were no longer primarily the guild that made movie stars. They were increasingly the voters who made the festivals.

The Academy shifted without telling us

Cruz and Bardem are not Scotti and Servillo. They carry weight, history, the burden of being obvious choices. That distinction matters — but not in the direction skeptics assume. When the Academy sees major actors surrendering to a confined space and a specific European sensibility rather than dominating a commercial stage, it reads differently now. The category rewards surrender, not conquest.

“

The skeptics are hedging against an Academy that no longer exists.

”

You can feel this shift in your own work whenever you notice that the thing you made with the most constraint. The smallest budget, the narrowest focus, the highest stakes — is the one people actually remember. The Academy learned this too. The skeptics simply haven't caught up.

Related Stories
Insight
"I already do that anyway"
The brain's autopilot routines are more powerful than any resolution you've made — and attaching a new behavior to one already running is how lasting change act…
Food
Gatekeeping Disguised as Democratization Killed Cocktail Culture
Between 2010 and 2020, craft cocktail expertise collapsed from paid artisanal practice into consumer obligation, with Instagram recipes positioning themselves a…
Science
OpenAI's Navier-Stokes Proof Answers a Different Question
OpenAI announced they solved a $1 million Millennium Prize problem about fluid dynamics, but the mathematics community rejected it—not for sloppiness, but becau…
More From Today's Edition
Culture
Malibu Driveways Fail Against 1972 Code
Nicolas Cage's Malibu sinkhole exposes a systemic failure: coastal California building codes still assume 1972 precipitation patterns, but atmospheric rivers no…
Technology
Matt Mullenweg and the founder paradox
When a CEO's personal authority becomes inseparable from a company's culture, removing them without replacing what made them essential tends to trigger either s…
View Past Editions >