Michael Bauman is an Oscar-nominated cinematographer who has just shot a Netflix series about Ed Gein. He's explained his visual choices by pointing to his own childhood in rural Wisconsin—the isolation, the claustrophobia, the way small spaces can contain enormous darkness.
It's a compelling story. It's also unfalsifiable, which makes it useless.
Ed Gein's farmhouse is inherently claustrophobic—literally a cramped, decaying rural structure where horrific things happened. Any cinematographer filming this story will shoot it small, tight, airless, will shoot decay and isolation and the walls closing in because these are not optional aesthetic choices. They are compulsory formal responses to the subject itself.
Bauman claims his Wisconsin roots shaped his approach to capturing mystery, madness. Claustrophobia, but claustrophobia isn't something he invented for this story—it's what Ed Gein's story requires. A cinematographer from Manhattan, from Miami, from Mars would shoot the same enclosed farmhouse and make it look enclosed because the visual language of a serial killer's cramped home isn't a fingerprint of the filmmaker's biography. It's a structural inevitability of the subject matter itself. This is the sleight of hand. Origin-story framing makes unfalsifiable claims feel like insights.
Bauman invokes his roots. Suddenly the viewer thinks his background caused his choices, when actually his background is irrelevant to whether those choices were necessary. He could have grown up anywhere and still shot this series identically because the subject matter demands it. But because we've been told his childhood drove the visual language, it feels like we understand something true about his process when we're actually just watching him take credit for choices the material compelled. This matters because it's how all of us retrofit meaning onto our work—you make a decision for a practical reason, then you tell a story about intention that makes you sound like you were in control all along.
The real work—the humbling part—is noticing when your constraints chose for you. When the material itself won that argument before you ever showed up.