The Daily Signal
Film

The Academy Didn't Miss Tom Cruise and Cynthia Erivo—It Chose Not to Honor Them

Basil·Monday, August 31, 2026 Edition
When Taste Becomes Doctrine

Tom Cruise has never won an Oscar, Cynthia Erivo's acclaimed work went ignored, and Timothée Chalamet waits. The entire argument rests on an unstated pivot: that the Academy's historical taste was wrong about these performances and a future nomination would constitute a correction.

But that assumes the Academy was making a misjudgment rather than a choice. More crucially, that their choice was made on grounds which will eventually align with critical opinion. Neither is obviously true.

For decades, the Academy has systematically favored intimate, interior dramatic work — the kind that reads as acting in the technical sense — over ensemble performance, action sequences, or genre work that requires a different skill set entirely. Cruise in Top Gun Maverick and Erivo in Wicked are not being penalized for being worse than past winners. They are being underweighted because their films belong to categories the Academy has historically treated as secondary. The Academy didn't miss them. It saw them and decided they weren't the kind of performance the award was designed to honor.

The Academy's taste, not error

The "overdue" frame obscures what's actually happening by accepting the Academy's taste as the baseline for justice and treating historical non-nomination as error rather than consistent aesthetics. If you accept that taste as legitimate, these actors are passed over unfairly. If you don't. If you think Wicked and Maverick are more interesting than most Best Picture nominees. Then they aren't overlooked at all. Simply working in forms the Academy has decided to value less, a decision that says nothing about whether they deserve recognition and everything about what the institution was built to recognize.

The Academy didn't miss them. It saw them and decided they weren't the kind of performance the award was designed to honor.

The real question becomes visible only when you stop asking whether these actors will finally win and start asking whether you care if they do. That tells you what you actually believe the award measures.

Watch Both Films

Watch Top Gun Maverick and Wicked back-to-back, then ask yourself honestly whether the Academy's historical preference for interior drama over spectacle reflects genuine excellence or learned institutional bias.

Related Stories
Insight
"That Idea's Stupid" — Said Too Soon
Judging your own ideas the moment they appear doesn't protect you from bad thinking — it guarantees it, by silencing everything good before it can fully form.
Anime
Baki Abandons Its Rules, Chases Infinite Scaling
When long-running shonen franchises exhaust their original settings' escalation ceiling, they import new worlds rather than finish their stories—Baki's isekai s
Entertainment
Thirty-Five Years of Invisible Vetoes
Randy Quaid's public complaint about Anne Hathaway's pregnancy casting a shadow over Days of Thunder 2 reads as isolated grievance—but it echoes an industrial p
More From Today's Edition
Comics
Star Wars Waits Until 2027 to Prove It Still Matters
Disney's announcement of Galaxy At War for 2027 follows the exact same strategic pause that failed after The Last Jedi — a multi-year gap intended to let fan an
View Past Editions >