Mike Flanagan's reboot is being pitched as the perfect successor to Yellowjackets because both center teenagers committing transgressive acts under pressure, both deliver elevated horror rather than camp or exploitation. Both suggest that the real monstrosity lives inside the group rather than outside it.
The pitch makes sense. It is also wrong about what made Yellowjackets hold an audience.
Yellowjackets' actual architecture is non-linear—the show cuts between 1996 and present day, forcing you to watch the same characters at two different moral ages simultaneously. You see the 19-year-old girl who made a devastating choice in the wilderness. Then you see the 40-year-old woman she became, and you cannot separate them into "victim" and "villain" because they are the same person carrying both identities at once.
That simultaneity is not a stylistic choice, it is the entire point. Past Yellowjackets and present Yellowjackets are not reconcilable versions of the same person—they are competing truths about what accountability actually means. Flanagan's reboot model does not work this way. His Haunting of Hill House, Gerald's Game, The Midnight Club are works with a single timeline and a protagonist who changes—a character begins in one state and arrives, through horror, at revelation.
It cannot generate the specific vertigo that Yellowjackets creates. The show's power depends on the fact that neither timeline is more true than the other—the girl in the plane crash and the woman she became are equally real, equally culpable, equally deserving of sympathy. You cannot resolve that tension with a linear narrative. You cannot resolve it at all. The article assumes that "elevated horror about teenagers transgressing" is a replicable genre. Genre is not what viewers are actually craving when they watch Yellowjackets.
What Flanagan has actually built his reputation on is transforming linear stories into enclosed psychological spaces. That is different work entirely.
Rewatch a Yellowjackets scene showing the same character at age 19 and 40 back-to-back and notice how the structure prevents you from choosing which version is the 'real' one.