The person who built the system gets to change it mid-game.
When a single entity owns the infrastructure that others depend on, the question of what's permissible stops being a matter of agreement and becomes a matter of assertion. Musk claims Ukraine violated Starlink terms of service for offensive operations, then unilaterally closes the loophole. Shadow the bald eagle abandons his nest when another male arrives. Elizabeth Holmes becomes cinema. What looks like violation in one moment becomes the justification for control in the next.
Key Insights
1
Dependency creates vulnerability because the person who owns the tool gets to define what the tool is for, and this definition can change whenever it serves their interest.
2
Starlink didn't have a policy against military use until the moment refusing that use became tactically useful to frame as a moral boundary rather than a commercial decision.
3
Anyone building their work, their art, or their movement on infrastructure they don't control is playing on a board where the rules are written in real time by someone else's hand.