1
Visibility is not earned through merit alone it is distributed by those who control the platforms where witness occurs. A cricketer's finger click becomes a global scandal because video exists and cameras were watching. A woman's allegation becomes news only when enough of them speak into channels that amplify. Wikipedia editors unionize because their labor happens in a space with infrastructure for collective voice.
2
The cost is that most people internalize the silence around their effort as evidence of its worthlessness. You tried and nobody saw, so it feels like you didn't really try. The standing ovation never comes because the studio audience was never there. Jared Leto had decades of witness to his choices before accountability arrived. Joan Crawford's film disappeared for ninety years not because it was bad but because nobody with power decided to make it visible again.
3
What breaks next is the assumption that merit creates its own audience. The people positioned to win are those who understand that visibility is infrastructure, not outcome. They build the platforms, control the restoration archives, decide which unions get recognized, which allegations get amplified. For everyone else, the work becomes a private ceremony, and privacy feels like failure.